Tax consequences of liquidating a partnership who is jamie colby dating

Posted by / 21-Aug-2017 17:45

They recommend that all employees, including those who are shareholders, promise—in writing—not to take clients with them if they leave the firm.

Such agreements can protect firms, the lawyers say.

THE IRS SAYS DISTRIBUTIONS of customer-based intangibles to shareholders are taxable.

When a firm or corporation distributes to its shareholders all of its assets, both tangible and intangible, and ceases doing business, the IRS says there is a taxable distribution of its intangible goodwill.

In the cases discussed in this article, the Tax Court did not distinguish between personal service corporations, such as CPA firms, and commercial organizations, such as an ice cream distribution company, in identifying the individual ownership of customer-based intangibles.

In planning for a liquidation of their professional practice or advising clients about the liquidation of a commercial organization, CPAs will find that the problems and the solutions are likely to be the same.

THE CRITICAL ISSUE FOR TAX PLANNING is whether the assets distributed are considered property under IRC code section 336 and whether the corporation owns them.

THE QUESTION OF WHO "OWNS" the clients and customer-based intangibles turns on whether there is an employment or noncompete agreement in effect at the time the intangibles are distributed.

There is the possibility of some relief, however: A CPA firm and its shareholders are in a better position to avoid serious tax consequences if such agreements are not in place when the professional corporation is dissolved.

In a firm or corporate liquidation, or when a shareholder redeems his or her interest, it’s not uncommon for the business to distribute property as well as money in exchange for the capital stock a shareholder held.

When such a business distributes its property, it generally is deemed to have sold the property at fair market value, which requires it to recognize a gain (IRC section 336(a)).

The shareholder, who treats the fair market value of the property as received in exchange for his or her stock, also recognizes a gain (IRC section 331(a)).

The critical issue for tax planning is whether the assets distributed are considered property under IRC section 336 and whether the corporation owns them.

tax consequences of liquidating a partnership-87tax consequences of liquidating a partnership-40tax consequences of liquidating a partnership-38

Trade secrets, special processes, patents and proprietary information are among an employer’s protectable interests, but how noncompete provisions create an employer property right isn’t clear.

One thought on “tax consequences of liquidating a partnership”

  1. He had a privileged upbringing first in Princeton, New Jersey, and then in the Main Line, the wealthy suburb of Philadelphia, where his father, Robert Mueller Jr was a lifelong Du Pont executive who had served as a Navy officer in the Atlantic and Mediterranean World War II.